top of page
image.jpeg
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.jpeg

6.2 DiGiComp Integration: Communication & Collaboration

Topic Activity

Sharing and Collaborating in Digital Spaces

Aim of the activity

·       Learners practice using one collaborative tool (Google Docs/Padlet).

·       Learners share a resource responsibly (with attribution and correct permissions).

·       Learners reflect on teamwork challenges in digital environments and suggest solutions.

·       Learners experience how AI can support group work through summarization or organization.

Target Group

Adult learners

Duration

60 minutes (blended or online)

Objective

·       Learners practice using one collaborative tool (Google Docs/Padlet).

·       Learners share a resource responsibly (with attribution and correct permissions).

·       Learners reflect on teamwork challenges in digital environments and suggest solutions.

·       Learners experience how AI can support group work through summarization or organization.

Materials necessary to execute activity

·       Access to Google Drive or Padlet.

·       Example documents (one correctly attributed, one without attribution).

·       Simple permissions guide (view/comment/edit).

·       AI demo tool (ChatGPT or similar) for summarization.

Steps for implementation

Warm-up (5 min):Discussion prompt: ‘How do you usually share files with friends/colleagues? What problems have you experienced?’

Input (10 min):Trainer explains permission settings (view, comment, edit), attribution and copyright basics. Short demo on how to share responsibly.

Group Task (20 min):In small groups, learners co-edit a shared document (e.g., ‘Group Digital Glossary’ or ‘Shared Learning Resource Folder).

o   Each group member contributes one entry/resource.

o   Learners practice setting correct permissions and adding attribution.

Ethical Reflection (10 min):Guided discussion: ‘What risks exist when sharing files without thinking about privacy or copyright? How do we avoid these issues?’

AI Demo (5 min):Trainer shows how AI can summarize group notes or organize contributions. Learners discuss: ‘When is AI helpful, and when should we be cautious?’

Wrap-up (10 min):Learners share one strategy they will apply in their next online collaboration.Strategies are written into a shared Padlet/Google Doc to create a collective ‘Collaboration Toolkit.’

Skills developed with the activity

Methodology

Blended

Online

Evaluation

Assessment:

Peer review: learners check each other’s contributions for accuracy and attribution.

Trainer evaluation: group product assessed for originality, collaboration, and responsible sharing.

Scenario-based quiz: short case questions on ethics, privacy, and collaboration challenges.

Self-reflection: quick exit poll:’What was the most useful new strategy you learned today?’

Reflection Prompts for Trainers

Self-Awareness: ‘How do I manage my own digital communication channels as a professional?’ Possible strategies: separating personal/professional accounts, setting clear response times, using one central platform.

Pedagogy: ‘How can I scaffold collaboration for learners with very low confidence in digital tools?’Possible strategies: step-by-step guides, assigning digital ‘buddies’,  starting with very simple collaborative tasks (e.g., co-writing a short list).

Inclusivity: ‘How do I ensure quieter learners have equal voice in group work?’Possible strategies: turn-taking rules, anonymous contributions via Padlet/Mentimeter, rotating group roles.

AI and Ethics: ‘How do I balance the convenience of AI with learner agency and critical thinking?’Possible strategies: encourage learners to fact-check AI outputs, assign group discussions comparing AI vs. human input, make AI use transparent.

Conflict Management: ‘How can I address misunderstandings or conflicts that arise in online collaboration?’Possible strategies: setting ground rules at the start, using private check-ins to de-escalate tension, assigning a ‘moderator’ role in group tasks.

Links & References

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.

EU co-funded logo.jpg
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.

bottom of page